This game of clear antinomies is generated precisely by humanist thoughtpure pura incorrotta dauncorrupted by Marchesini, who wants at all costs to pura incorrotta da differentiate the human condition from the non-human one, whether it be non-human (animal or machine) or inhuman (certain predicative structures). There is a pure, uncorrupted identity. To be purified, ordered, and which constitutes man’s greatest aspiration. In contrast to what is impure, chthonic, telluric, which instead of allowing an ascent muddy, mix, retain, lower. Hence the generation of the myths of purity, with the consequent hygienism, racism, eugenics. Criminal physiognomy. All ways to diverge from the impure, rather than proceed in an integrative manner towards otherness, stripping oneself of superstructures rather than accepting cross-breeding , redundancy3.
hailed by philosophers and sociologists such as Michel Maffesoli
inconceivable in ecosystem processes – man as a new telluric force (cit. Antonio Stoppani2). Return to index Posthuman thought: beyond dichotomies and the myth of purity One of the greatest problems raised by Marchesini and which posthuman thought takes on is that of overcoming dichotomies. It is a question that is linked to our other previous writings on the new postmodern conception of reality, hailed by philosophers and sociologists such as Michel Maffesoli, and who see in the postmodern business lead world a return of paganism in new forms and therefore also an overcoming of religious dualisms and ideological-modern ones, which cause a split between the world as it is and as it should be.
talking about the anthropocene since the end of the 19th century
revolutionand before that the thirst for conquest which, starting from the end pura incorrotta da of the Middle Ages, led civilized European man to subjugate disparate peoples and cultures, and to intervene in new contexts foreign to him. More generally, if great wonders began with the Renaissance, accompanying the history of man, with the historical unfolding pure uncorrupted by new problems arise, in particular those due to the arrogance with which man places himself towards nature ( anthropocentrism), and with which some men will position themselves BM Leads towards others (Eurocentrism). In this wake
.
from the end of the 19th century we will begin to talk about the anthropocene. hat is. that historical-evolutionary era where man’s actions cause an impact. Before then,
